Often we hear terms bandied about and do not understand what they are or how they affect us. Yield Spread Premium or YSP is one of those terms. In listening to some legislators, it seems like a very bad thing indeed. But, once it is understood, it can make good sense. And when it can preserve resources of the consumer in a home purchase, it does make good sense. As long as it is not abused, and the vast majority of the time it is not, it is a good tool to use in obtaining mortgage financing. The best way to illustrate it is to look at something completely different.
When you go into the supermarket, there is often a premium that is offered by the grocer. Buy 3, get one free. The consumer purchases the 3 items at the regular price and then gets a 4th item without having to pay for it. An alternative could be a reduction in price for those other 3 items which would result in paying a similar price for the 4th item instead of getting it 'free'. In the end, the consumer ends up with the same products without paying any more for them.
In the mortgage world, lenders provide a premium based on certain rates. These premiums can be used to help pay closing costs. The closing costs are still the same as they would be without the premium, but the distribution of who is paying them changes. Consumers can make a choice. Although this is not exactly the same as the supermarket example, the concept is the same. Pay a higher price [note rate] over time to save money [lower out of pocket closing costs] now. Or, pay more costs now [out of pocket closing costs] to save money over time [lower note rate]. Removing these premiums simply reduces consumer options. Let's look at some simple transactions to illustrate this on the mortgage side.
The borrower wants to borrow $100,000 to purchase a home. There are 3 choices [really there are many more]. He can pay no points, one point or two points with a lender. He can pay a 2% broker fee entirely, split the cost with the lender, or have the lender pay the entire amount out of Yield Spread Premium. If the borrower obtains a rate of 5%, for example, the lender has a premium available to offset any points that may be charged. In this example, $2000. A point is one percent of the mortgage amount. If the borrower wants 4.75% as a note rate, then one point [$1000] would be charged. The lender still receives $2000 as 1 point comes from its premium. The borrower electing a 4.5% rate would pay 2 points or $2000 to the lender.
If you are using a broker, simply substitute the broker fee as terminology for points. At 5%, the lender pays the broker fee of $2,000 and the borrower pays nothing out of pocket. At 4.75%, the lender pays from YSP $1000 to the broker and the borrower pays $1000. And at 4.5%, the borrower pays the entire $2000 broker fee. Yield Spread Premium legislation has been proposed to eliminate it entirely. Which means, whether using a broker or lender, fewer options will be available to the consumer.
The lack of knowledge on its purpose is the main reason it is even being talked about. The illustrations above are not meant to be anything other than illustrations. In some instances, a broker can find a more attractive mortgage for you than a direct lender. Sometimes, the opposite is true. But the point is that YSP is not a bad thing, only a misunderstood thing.
Recent Comments